Why France's Debt Puts the Union at Risk

The stability framework designed to protect the Eurozone is facing a challenge it was never truly built for: a crisis of fiscal credibility within its core. Market scrutiny has shifted from peripheral economies to founding members like France, where high public debt and stagnant growth are colliding with a new era of restrictive monetary policy.

The central conflict is no longer theoretical. It is a direct confrontation between the EU's technocratic fiscal rules and the political realities of its most powerful sovereign states.

Echoes of 2012 and the Draghi Put

The last systemic crisis, which peaked in 2010-2012, was primarily a liquidity crisis in smaller economies. It was ultimately quelled not by a structural solution, but by the sheer force of will of the European Central Bank.

  • The now-famous pledge by then-ECB President Mario Draghi to do "whatever it takes to preserve the euro" created a powerful market backstop—a "put" against a Eurozone breakup—that has held the union together.
  • That backstop, however, was never tested against a solvency and political crisis in a nation the size of France.

The Politics of Paralysis in the Eurozone's Core

At the heart of the current dilemma lies the "Too Big to Fail, Too Big to Rescue" paradox. France's public debt exceeds 115% of its GDP, with deficits projected to remain well above the EU's 3% mandate. While its economy is indispensable, its scale makes a Greek-style bailout financially and politically impossible.

  • This economic vulnerability is being exploited by potent political forces. Figures like Marine Le Pen on the right and Jean-Luc Mélenchon on the left channel public resistance to fiscal consolidation, framing any EU-level oversight as an attack on national sovereignty.
  • This creates a political paralysis, making meaningful reform nearly impossible.

Furthermore, any government attempting to implement sharp budget cuts faces the "Austerity Paradox". In an economy where state spending accounts for nearly 58% of GDP, crude austerity can trigger a recession, shrinking the denominator (GDP) faster than the numerator (debt) and making the overall debt ratio worse. This economic reality gives political credence to the anti-reform narrative.

A Public Primed for (Social) Spending

Compounding this paralysis is a fundamental ideological shift that the European Union itself has cultivated. For the past fifteen years, the bloc's political messaging has pivoted away from a singular focus on growth and economic efficiency. Instead, the EU has championed landmark policies like the European Green Deal and the European Pillar of Social Rights. This narrative has successfully shifted public and political priorities toward ecology, social justice, and sustainability, creating a powerful expectation of the state as a protector and provider. The unintended consequence is that traditional calls for fiscal discipline and budget cuts are now perceived by a large segment of the population not just as economically painful, but as an ideological betrayal of the modern "European model".

For the past fifteen years, the bloc's political messaging has pivoted away from a singular focus on growth and economic efficiency. Instead, the EU has championed landmark policies like the European Green Deal and the European Pillar of Social Rights.

This deep-seated shift provides fertile ground for political movements that reject fiscal consolidation outright. Leaders like Jean-Luc Mélenchon find a highly receptive audience when they counter calls for austerity with demands for higher taxes on wealth and corporations to fund social services, the green transition and bolster public services. This dynamic places any reformist government in an impossible bind.

When Brussels or fiscally conservative states demand budget cuts, they are easily portrayed as hypocritical relics of a bygone era, prioritizing abstract fiscal targets over the tangible social and ecological goals the EU has spent years promoting. It makes any attempt at austerity not just a policy dispute, but a trigger for mass popular opposition that feels ideologically justified.

The Brussels Dilemma: Rules vs. Reality

This context exposes the EU's fundamental weakness: its rules are applied with political flexibility. The strict discipline meted out to Greece cannot be replicated for France without triggering a catastrophic political confrontation. Any attempt to enforce the rules harshly would be seen as a direct challenge to French sovereignty, likely fueling the political movements EU leaders fear.

  • This creates a significant Moral Hazard. If a core country knows it is too big to be allowed to fail, its incentive to implement unpopular but necessary reforms is severely diminished.
  • In theory, the ECB’s crisis-fighting tools have conditionality attached, but the political will to withhold support from France and risk a systemic meltdown is questionable at best.
  • A French government under pressure from Brussels can point to the rising poll numbers for Le Pen and Mélenchon and say to their EU partners: "If you push us too hard, you might get them. And they will threaten to blow this whole thing up."
  • The result is a cycle of politically expedient compromises that fail to address the underlying debt trajectory.
  • For reference, the US Federal Reserve can set interest rates with a singular focus on US inflation and employment.
  • The ECB, in contrast, must set policy for 20 diverse economies. It remains constrained by "fragmentation risk"—the danger that higher interest rates could precipitate a debt crisis in a member state.

This inherent caution forces the ECB to adopt a structurally more dovish stance than the Fed, placing persistent downward pressure on the EUR/USD.

Political Risk to Dictate EUR/USD Path

The Euro's future now hinges on a precarious political feedback loop. The baseline expectation is that a full-blown crisis will be averted, but the pathway to a severe market dislocation is clear and plausible.

  • Baseline Scenario: Managed Instability. The most probable outcome remains a continuation of politically negotiated compromises. Fearing fierce public resistance, governments will avoid deep structural reforms, opting instead for minor adjustments that temporarily satisfy Brussels and the markets. This avoids an immediate political crisis but fails to solve the underlying debt issue, condemning the Eurozone to a period of low growth and high debt—a "Japanification". In this environment, the EUR would remain structurally weak, weighed down by poor fundamentals but saved from outright collapse by the ECB's implicit backstop.
  • Acute Risk Scenario: The Austerity-Rejection Spiral. This scenario unfolds in a clear sequence. First, a major government, like France's, attempts to pass a significant fiscal consolidation package under market pressure. Second, the reforms are met with fierce and widespread public resistance, leading to strikes and political turmoil. Third, the government is unable to sustain the political cost and is replaced in subsequent elections by a left-leaning or populist coalition that campaigned on an anti-austerity platform. This new government then reverses the reforms and drives up public spending, funded by higher taxes on wealth and corporations. This political pivot is viewed by international markets as a definitive break from fiscal sustainability, triggering a sharp loss of confidence. Such an event would force the ECB to act to prevent a bond market collapse, but the political chaos would likely cause a rapid sell-off of the Euro, driving the EUR/USD down.

Ultimately, the European project is caught in a contradiction of its own design. Its survival now depends on its core members finding a politically viable path to fiscal sustainability—a task that, for now, appears increasingly remote.

Disclaimer

Please note that Benchmark does not produce investment advice in any form. Our articles are not research reports and are not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decision. All investments involve risk and the past performance of a security or financial product does not guarantee future returns. Investors have to conduct their own research before conducting any transaction. There is always the risk of losing parts or all of your money when you invest in securities or other financial products.

Credits

Photo by Tabrez Syed / Unsplash.