Regulate And Tax? Think Again!
As the United States strengthens its grip over the technologies the world increasingly relies on—most critically, advanced semiconductors—other countries find themselves in a position of dependence that threatens their sovereignty. The latest warnings from President Donald Trump make clear that access to American chips could be weaponized in trade disputes, forcing nations to choose between compliance and exclusion.
- On Monday evening, Trump announced that countries imposing digital taxes or regulations on American tech firms such as Google and Meta Platforms would face a dual retaliation: tariffs on their exports to the U.S. and restrictions on access to U.S. technology, particularly semiconductors.
- The warning highlights a sharp reality: the U.S. dominates the global chip industry through firms like Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, whose products are essential for training artificial intelligence models and powering modern data infrastructure.
For nations trying to regulate or tax U.S. tech giants, the cost may now extend beyond tariffs—it could mean being cut off from the chips their economies and industries depend on.
Negotiating From Weakness
Some countries may still have bargaining chips of their own. China, for example, holds leverage through its control over rare-earth magnets, crucial for electronics and clean energy systems. This gives Beijing at least some room to negotiate in a technology standoff.
- Europe, however, appears far more vulnerable. Lacking both advanced semiconductor capabilities and critical raw materials, the European Union has little to counter with.
- Its digital tax policies—long a point of contention with Washington—could leave it exposed to both tariffs and chip restrictions without much leverage in return.
- Earlier this year, Trump threatened Canada with higher tariffs over a proposed digital tax, forcing Ottawa to pull back. Brazil faced a similar response when it advanced new tech laws.
And in Europe, digital taxation and regulation have repeatedly clashed with U.S. trade demands, with no clear resolution in sight. The latest threats suggest Washington is prepared to escalate the fight using not only tariffs but also technology supply lines as pressure points.
Industry Uncertainty
The idea of restricting chip exports to punish trading partners could also generate friction with U.S. companies themselves. Semiconductor makers have largely welcomed the Trump administration’s recent decision to roll back Biden-era limits on chip exports, favoring a freer flow of products across markets. Firms like Microsoft, which need semiconductors to build overseas data centers, have already been frustrated by delays in export licensing.
- Now, they face a new wave of uncertainty: whether U.S. policy will once again restrict access for strategic or political reasons.
- National-security hawks within Trump’s own party have voiced concerns about letting advanced chips flow too freely abroad.
Europe's Own Trap
Europe remains trapped in its paradigm of sustainability, prioritizing green policies and climate goals above almost every other strategic consideration. While these initiatives are well-intentioned, they come at the expense of industrial competitiveness, technological innovation, and strategic autonomy.
- As the United States and China aggressively expand their technological capabilities—particularly in semiconductors, artificial intelligence, and critical supply chains—Europe’s narrow focus leaves it increasingly vulnerable.
- Without significant leverage in technology or access to critical resources, the continent risks finding itself marginalized in global negotiations. Its emphasis on sustainability, important as it may be for long-term environmental goals, cannot substitute for the hard power and bargaining strength that come from technological leadership.
In this environment, Europe will have little to say, even less to negotiate, and may increasingly be forced to follow the rules set by others rather than shape them.
Disclaimer
Please note that Benchmark does not produce investment advice in any form. Our articles are not research reports and are not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decision. All investments involve risk and the past performance of a security or financial product does not guarantee future returns. Investors have to conduct their own research before conducting any transaction. There is always the risk of losing parts or all of your money when you invest in securities or other financial products.
Credits
